Philosophy of science group meetings
Upcoming meetings
Tuesdays 12–1pm, unless otherwise noted
- PhilSci reading group: Durand & Ramsey (2019), “The nature of programmed cell death” (Emily)
- lab meeting
- PhilSci reading group: TBD (Ana)
- lab meeting (Emily away at PSA)
- PhilSci reading group: TBD
- no meeting (ANZAP conference)
- lab meeting (last one of 2026!)
- lab meeting (first one of 2027!)
- PhilSci reading group: TBD
- lab meeting
- PhilSci reading group: TBD
- lab meeting
Nothing scheduled yet.
Past reading group archives
2026
- Maureen O’Malley’s chapter draft from her book Philosophical issues in microbiome research
- Joyce Havstad’s draft chapter from her book The Selection of Scientific Methods
- Medawar, “Is the scientific paper a fraud?” + Howitt & Wilson, “Revisiting ‘Is the scientific paper a fraud?’”
- Smart, “The metaphysics of disease”
- Glackin et al., “Out of our heads: addiction and psychiatric externalism”
- Bich & Menatti: “Homeostasis and health: from balance to change”
- Dupré & Nicholson, “A manifesto for a processual philosophy of biology”
- Brett Calcott giving a talk: “DNA encodes a programme for cellular cognition”
- Bertolaso and Dupré, “A processual perspective on cancer”
- Murphy, “Conceptual foundations of biological psychiatry”
- William Pearman’s manuscript for feedback, “Host-microbiome research requires clearly articulated null hypotheses”
- Athéa & Montagnac, “Of what is ‘cellular memory’ the name? Perspectives across the life sciences”
- Gabbi Courtenay work in progress discussion
- Žukauskaitė, “Sympoiesis, Autopoiesis, and Immunity: How to Coexist with Nonhuman Others?”
- Barandiaran, “Organizational accounts of malfunction: The dual-order approach and the normative field alternative”
- Bocchi, “Biodiversity skepticism and measurement practices”
- Barandiaran & Almendros, “Transforming agency: on the mode of existence of large language models”
2025
- Maureen O’Malley’s draft chapter from Philosophical issues in microbiome research: Chapter 3: Natural microbiomes and human ‘nature’
- Rose Novick, “The neutral theory of conceptual complexity”
- Dan McShea visit and teleology discussion.
- Derek Skillings’ draft paper on holobionts.
- Karen Neander, “Functions as selected effects: The conceptual analyst’s defense”
- Arno Wouters, “Four notions of biological function”
- James Russell’s draft paper for feedback, “Invasive species eradication standards”
- David Kelley’s draft paper for feedback, “Philosophy Moves and Mini-Moves”
- Mark Bedau visit.
- John Matthewson & Paul Griffiths, “Biological criteria of disease: Four ways of going wrong”
- Varga, “Mental health promotion and the positive concept of health: Navigating dilemmas” (Natalie)
- Gluckman et al., “The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) Concept: Past, Present, and Future” (Sam)
- Vidal, “What is a worldview?” (Ana)
- John Matthewson & Simon Keller’s draft paper on health & disease concepts (Zoom)
- Plutynski, “How is cancer complex?” (Hiva)
- Russell Meyer’s draft paper “It’s Cognition, With Style: Rethinking the Biology of Intelligence”
- Chapter 5 of Plutynski Explaining cancer: finding order in disorder (Hiva)
- PhilSci Reading Group: draft paper by Pietro Allegretti (Waikato)
- Intro and Chapter 1 of Roughgarden, Evolution’s Rainbow
2024
- Griffin et al., “Compassionate Conservation Clashes With Conservation Biology: Should Empathy, Compassion, and Deontological Moral Principles Drive Conservation Practice?”
- Whyte, “Against crisis epistemology”
- Chalmers, “What is conceptual engineering and what should it be?”
- Sanches de Oliveira et al., “Scientific practice as ecological-enactive co-construction”
- Massimi, Perspectival Realism chapter 1
- Massimi, Perspectival Realism chapter 2
- Massimi, Perspectival Realism chapter 3
- Massimi, Perspectival Realism chapter 4
- Massimi, Perspectival Realism chapter 5
- Massimi, Perspectival Realism chapter 11
- Giere, “Modest evolutionary naturalism”
- Neil Levy, “No trespassing! Abandoning the novice/expert problem”
- Caleb Hazelwood (manuscript for feedback), “Beanbag holobionts”
- James Mansell presenting PhD thesis overview
- Samuel Johnson et al., “Conviction Narrative Theory: A theory of choice under radical uncertainty”
2023
- Cline, “Do Species Really Matter? The Case of ‘The’ Galápagos Giant Tortoise”
- Ally’s draft paper “Landing among the stars: failure response planning for Predator Free 2050”
- Brett’s practice talk for Major Transitions in the Evolution of Cognition workshop
- Chapter 1 of Joyce Havstad’s book draft manuscript
- Intemann, “Who needs consensus anyway? Addressing manufactured doubt and increasing public trust in climate science”
- Kovaka, “Climate change denial and beliefs about science”
- Nathan, “Pluralism is the answer! What is the question?”
- Mayden, “Consilience and a hierarchy of species concepts: Advances toward closure on the species puzzle”
- Bikyu’s draft paper
- Aja Watkins’ draft paper
- Kiper et al., “Experimental philosophy”
- David’s draft paper
- Fleisher, “Rational endorsement”
- Pavlinov, excerpts from The species problem: a conceptual history
- Doolittle, “Speciation without species”
- Odenbaugh, “On the very idea of an ecosystem”
- Levy, “Too humble for words”
- Gabbi’s PhD writing sample draft
- Wilholt, “Epistemic trust in science”
- Bright, “On fraud”
- Matthew Slater visiting
2022
- Reydon, “On radical solutions in the philosophy of biology: What does ‘individuals thinking’ actually solve?”
- David’s draft paper “Philosophical moves”
- Bulbulia, “The cognitive and evolutionary psychology of religion”
- Antony, “Quine as Feminist: The Radical Import of Naturalized Epistemology”
- Feyaerts & Vanheule, “The logic of appearance: Dennett, phenomenology and psychoanalysis”
- Michaelian, “Is external memory memory? Biological memory and extended mind”
- Vazquez, “The gay gene(s)? Rethinking the concept of sexual orientation in the context of science”
- Nguyen, “Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles”
- Curry, “Scientific psychology for folk craft: The case of IQ”
- Mitchell, “Integrative pluralism”
- Deaven, “Relative significance controversies in evolutionary biology”